
Let this serve me as a lesson and never again endorse courses of whatever kind and provenance... without having taken them myself first!
I enrolled, because I wanted to see the juice that would pour out of conservationists mouths, having a hands on approach and accessibility on some of these works, namely the Pre-Raphaelites and Whistler.
What one gets for 20 pounds is not worth a penny. Not that I was expecting "Advanced Techniques for the will be Master"...
The Pre-Raphaelite chapter is as poor as it gets. A lot of watery, generalist , THEORICAL writing, and ONE ( yes one) video reel of one of the conservationists, showing how to prepare one of the so called mediums used at the time, to add into the oils.
Pre-Raphaelite technique on the other hand was quite complex! A multitude of translucent glazes, mixed with mediums of their concoction, as well as varnishes, overlapping lighter colors and backgrounds, hardly ever mixing white to light up tone, but rather applying it under, as pure color and then use a wash of color over, much as a stainglass.
What really made the hair on the back of my head straight up , was the Whistler section.
More videos, sure. Not deeper content for that matter.
But the rotten cherry, was hearing the Head of Conservation Science, Stephen Hackney, mumbling and stumbling about Whistler's techniques and materials, whistle exacting " He used oils that came on a tube like this ("Winton" from Winsor&Newton: the cheap student range!), diluted in oil and spirit of turpentine, but for health and safety reasons , we are using water (!!)"
Ok. Time out.
Oils that dilute in water are in the market for the last decade or so. They are mostly in an extremely translucent range mixed with mineral oils, therefore water soluble.
They lack richness, bold and body. To have the conservation department of a top museum saying that they don't want to smell turps and linseed oil...for God's sake man, you have the facilities: open up a window!
One of the conservationist then pretend to show how the process of painting was done.
Whistlers lavish, extremely rich and runny washes, were reduced to a dabbling of a few darker tones (of a mighty stiff consistency, one must point) and just as the harder parts would come: controlling washes and overlapping, its CUT!
Please proceed to your quiz and don't forget your hat on the way out.
Guttered.
